Natural Resources Canada | Ressources naturelles CanadaGovernment of Canada | Gouvernement du Canada
FrançaisContact CCRSCCRS Site HelpSearch the CCRS WebsiteGovernment of Canada web site
Canada Centre for Remote SensingHome page of the Canada Centre for Remote SensingDetailed Listing of this SiteTechnical publications of CCRS staffExplanations of remote sensing terminology.Natural Resources Canada
Staff and organizationCCRS research programsImages and SensorsLearning aids and reference materialsThe Canadian remote sensing community

Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. Sensors
3. Microwaves
4. Image Analysis
5. Applications

Home > LearningTutorials

Fundamentals of Remote Sensing


Section bar - Chapter 2

 

2.12 Whiz Quiz - Answers

MSS vs TM

There are several reasons why TM data may be considered more useful than MSS data. Although the areal coverage of a TM scene is virtually the same as a MSS scene, TM offers higher spatial, spectral, and radiometric resolution. The spatial resolution is 30 m compared to 80 m (except for the TM thermal channels, which are 120 m to 240 m). Thus, the level of spatial detail detectable in TM data is better. TM has more spectral channels which are narrower and better placed in the spectrum for certain applications, particularly vegetation discrimination. In addition, the increase from 6 bits to 8 bits for data recording represents a four-fold increase in the radiometric resolution of the data. (Remember, 6 bits = 26 = 64, and 8 bits = 28 = 256 - therefore, 256/64 = 4). However, this does not mean that TM data are "better" than MSS data. Indeed, MSS data are still used to this day and provide an excellent data source for many applications. If the desired information cannot be extracted from MSS data, then perhaps the higher spatial, spectral, and radiometric resolution of TM data may be more useful.
Back to the question...

back to Section 2.12 Did you Know 2.12? Section 2.13


Updated2002-08-21 go to top of page Important Notices