|
2.12 Whiz Quiz - Answers
![MSS vs TM](../graphics/wa2_12.gif)
There are several reasons why TM data may be considered more useful than MSS data. Although the areal coverage of a TM scene is virtually the same as a MSS scene, TM offers higher spatial, spectral, and radiometric resolution. The spatial resolution is 30 m compared to 80 m (except for the TM thermal channels, which are 120 m to 240 m). Thus, the level of spatial detail detectable in TM data is better. TM has more spectral channels which are narrower and better placed in the spectrum for certain applications, particularly vegetation discrimination. In addition, the increase from 6 bits to 8 bits for data recording represents a four-fold increase in the radiometric resolution of the data. (Remember, 6 bits = 26 = 64, and 8 bits = 28 = 256 - therefore, 256/64 = 4). However, this does not mean that TM data are "better" than MSS data. Indeed, MSS data are still used to this day and provide an excellent data source for many applications. If the desired information cannot be extracted from MSS data, then perhaps the higher spatial, spectral, and radiometric resolution of TM data may be more useful.
Back to the question...
![Section 2.13](../graphics/rightarrow.gif)
|